Current:Home > FinanceFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -AssetScope
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-12 04:12:15
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (596)
Related
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- College football award winners for 2023 season: Who took home trophies?
- Eagles security guard DiSandro banned from sideline for Sunday Night Football vs. Cowboys
- 'She was a pure creator.' The art world rediscovers Surrealist painter Leonor Fini
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Nacua and Flowers set for matchup of top rookie receivers when the Rams visit Ravens
- Where to watch 'The Polar Express': Streaming info, TV channel showtimes, cast
- The EU wants to put a tax on emissions from imports. It’s irked some other nations at COP28
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- US, South Korea and Japan urge a stronger international push to curb North Korea’s nuclear program
Ranking
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- The EU wants to put a tax on emissions from imports. It’s irked some other nations at COP28
- A hospital fire near Rome kills at least 3 and causes an emergency evacuation of all patients
- Judge approves settlement barring U.S. border officials from reviving family separation policy for 8 years
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- 'Murder in Boston' is what a docuseries should look like
- Tensions are soaring between Guyana and Venezuela over century-old territorial dispute
- Denmark, a Global Climate Policy Leader, Strains to Live Up to High Ambitions
Recommendation
San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
Homes damaged by apparent tornado as severe storms rake Tennessee
Where to watch 'The Polar Express': Streaming info, TV channel showtimes, cast
A British Palestinian surgeon gave testimony to a UK war crimes unit after returning from Gaza
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
Online scamming industry includes more human trafficking victims, Interpol says
The NRA has a surprising defender in its free speech case before the Supreme Court: the ACLU
'She was a pure creator.' The art world rediscovers Surrealist painter Leonor Fini